CanonNews / Thursday, November 28, 2019 / Categories: Canon Patents Canon Patent Application: Canon RF Primes I know there's been alot of talk about Canon needing to get lower cost primes and lenses out for the RF mount, that not all lenses can be in the $2000-$3000 range. Take heart, this patent application is meant for you. In this patent application, Canon describes quite a few lower cost Canon RF mount primes; RF 35 F1.8 RF 20 F2.0 RF 35 F2.8 RF 45 F2.8 RF 35 F2.0 and also making an appearance is a zoom, a Canon RF 16-35 F4.0, a lens I'm certainly looking forward to for the RF mount. The lens details are as follows; Focal length: 35.60 F number: 1.85 Half angle of view: 31.22 Image height: 21.64 Lens length: 81.87 Back focus: 13.49 Focal length: 20.50 F number: 2.06 Half angle of view: 46.54 Image height: 21.64 Lens length: 90.13 Back focus: 13.50 Focal length: 35.70 F number: 2.88 Half angle of view: 31.22 Image height: 21.64 Lens length: 60.00 Back focus: 13.15 Focal length: 44.70 F number: 2.85 Half angle of view: 25.83 Image height: 21.64 Lens length: 62.63 Back focus: 13.13 Focal length: 35.91 F number: 2.06 Half angle of view: 31.07 Image height: 21.64 Lens length: 50.50 Back focus: 15.05 Focal length: 16.48 24.02 33.75 F number: 4.12 Half angle of view: 52.70 42.01 32.66 Image height: 21.64 Lens length: 117.64 109.16 110.13 Back focus: 11.50 19.17 29.63 Japan Patent Application: 2019-204115 Japan Patent Application: 2019-204114 Japan Patent Application: 2019-204113 Canon Patent Application: Mirrorless kit lenses Happy Thanksgiving from CanonNews Print 4499 Tags: Lenses Canon RF Patent Application More links JPO JPO JPO Related articles ICYMI: Canon RF 100mm F2.8L IS Macro Review TDP Reviews the Canon RF-S 18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM Meyer Optik Görlitz adds native Canon RF to its lens lineup Deal of the Day: Lensbaby 85mm F1.8 for Canon RF and Canon EF Canon officially announces the Canon RF 24mm F1.8 STM and the Canon RF 15-30mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.blog comments powered by Disqus